Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double A-side

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. FCYTravis 07:11, 7 August 2005 (UTC)

Double A-side

 * Delete dicdef: a single whose B-side turns out to be a hit. Too vague to be a maintainable list.&mdash;Wahoofive (talk) 03:57, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
 * We don't need another list for this. Redirect... to b-side I guess, since that's where a-side redirects to. (Although I can't help but find that utterly perplexing.) Flowerparty talk 04:10, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
 * It's an accident of history. B-side was created in 2002, A-Side was created in 2004, and A-side was created in 2005.  They were all merged into the oldest of the three. Uncle G 13:29:19, 2005-08-02 (UTC)
 * Keep. or else merge with b-side. Just needs some expansion. Had 10 links to it before even created. Redwolf24 04:40, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. Notable musical concept. Capitalistroadster 05:00, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete dicdef, unmaintainable list. JamesBurns 05:36, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep important music concept, and something which I could easily imagine people looking up, as the meaning is hardly self-evident from the term. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 11:16, August 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * Reminder: offering meanings of words or phrases is the job of Wiktionary.&mdash;Wahoofive (talk) 16:06, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Information is already contained in B-side. Transwiki to Wiktionary if they can use it, and redirect to B-side. Scott5114 19:52, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to B-side. -R. fiend 20:01, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. - Che Nuevara, the Democratic Revolutionary 02:14, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to A-side... or apparently B-side? BTW a double A-side isn't just a single whose B-side turns out to be a hit, it's one where both tracks were released with equal emphasis, there may also be b-sides on the single. -- Lochaber 11:16, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
 * These various concepts are explained, in context (addressing the points made by Lochaber), in B-side. People are perhaps being mis-led by the article title.  The article text discusses all of the concepts: 'A' sides, 'B' sides, 'double-A' sides and so forth.  (A rename may be in order.)  A-Side was merged there by its original author (who noted the overlap in the edit summary) back in January, and most of the other permutations simply redirect there.  I concur with that anonymous editor. Merge to B-side.  Uncle G 13:29:19, 2005-08-02 (UTC)
 * keep, notable form of record release. Kappa 17:15, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with b-side, especially since a-side also redirects there. --FuriousFreddy 20:08, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. arj 00:24, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.