Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double Cross (role-playing game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No reliable sources presented, which seems to negate the lone "keep" argument. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 18:15, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Double Cross (role-playing game)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article on a game cites no sources of any kind. A search on JSTOR, newspapers.com, and Google News fails to find any reference to "Double Cross" within the context of a game. Chetsford (talk) 10:05, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Chetsford (talk) 10:11, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Improper nom by clueless editorThe nom apparently believes that tabletop roleplaying rules are "designed to be used for the play of a game exactly like Monopoly or Stratego". Nobody who does not understand the text of a Wikipedia article in its plain meaning can legitimately noninate that article for deletion. Newimpartial (talk) 15:20, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment Remove personal attack.  HighKing++ 13:00, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Chetsford (talk) 16:19, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Chetsford (talk) 16:19, 13 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep if more sources can be found, otherwise merge to List of role-playing games by name. There are numerous citations on the Japanese version of this article. BOZ (talk) 18:51, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Move to Draft for now and eventually merge the best of the content to a new article on Anime RPGs (with redirect), unless there is some Japanese language RS material so don't know about. An article on anime games - an undoubtedly notable topic - will allow relevant content to be brought together in one place, preferably minus the explanation of game mechanics. I think this works better than using the List of role-playing games for something other than its intended purpose. Newimpartial (talk) 21:15, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete No indications of notability, references establishing notability cannot be found or produced. Topic fails GNG.  HighKing++ 13:04, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete No indications of notability.Slatersteven (talk) 14:32, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete entire article is sourced to the game itself. No English RS found. Maybe there is Japanese material which could establish notability but none have been presented. Fails GNF. No valid redirect target exists. Jbh  Talk  17:07, 20 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.