Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double Eleven


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. WP:SNOW. Not the usual number of !votes for a snow, yes, but given the importance of the title involved, notability is established to the point Phil is ordering long jammies. The Bushranger One ping only 02:01, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Double Eleven

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Not notable. Awards are minor. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:59, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
 * • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 13 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment Keep - They're not some no-name developer, they're developing a game in a multi-million dollar selling franchise, (LittleBigPlanet Vita) and the company's founders were originally from Rockstar Games, a major video game developer/publisher. There's sources in the article, and they're focused on the company, not the game series. I'm leaning towards keep unless a better rationale is presented... Sergecross73   msg me   20:22, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep They are developing a big game for the new PSP Vita. That is enough for a keep for me. --Mr. Mario (talk) 21:56, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - As per others. They are notable due to their development of a high profile game. - X201 (talk) 12:51, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - They are developing LittleBigPlanet for the Sony PS Vita; a multi-million selling series with a massive community. They are also signed exclusively with Sony, so are likely to be working on another one of their large IPs after. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deikin Karura (talk • contribs) 13:05, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.