Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double Eleven (company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 18:14, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Double Eleven (company)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I failed to find WP:SIGCOV besides simple announcements, sponsored articles, and primary source interviews. This indicates a failure of WP:ORGTRIV, which excludes "standard notices, brief announcements, and routine coverage". Notability is also not inherited from the games themselves. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Subject to a previous AFD, Articles for deletion/Double Eleven, so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 17:52, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Companies.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:41, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep: This two are quite good, covering the company's workplace practices. Routine coverage from major RS is also fairly regular but not trivial. I think the recent news surrounding Prison Architect 2 may also count as SIGCOV for the studio. OceanHok (talk) 08:33, 6 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Comment The developer appears notable enough to be mentione somewhere as an WP:ATD. Also related to Pneuma insidermedia.com IgelRM (talk) 18:04, 6 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep: There is enough coverage about the company itself to amount to WP:SIGCOV. The two articles presented above by OceanHok are particularly in-depth. The company has also received a lot of less-in-depth coverage about their games. While notability is not inherited, these articles do focus more on the company than you might expect because of the specific agreement they were trying to reach about the game (ex: ). Coverage definitely adds up to NCORP.   C F A   💬  23:43, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: Passes WP:GNG based on sources presented above. Sal2100 (talk) 17:18, 12 July 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.