Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double chin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as although there's still time before a week comes for this AfD, it seems the consensus is clear and there are no serious needs for deletion thus keep (NAC). SwisterTwister  talk  05:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Double chin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completely unnecessary article. No information worth merging anywhere. Lazarusloafer (talk) 06:24, 6 February 2016 (UTC) Creating deletion discussion for Double chin


 * Keep – An encyclopedic topic that passes WP:GNG, having received significant coverage in scholarly sources. Source examples include, but are not limited to:, , . The topic has also received significant coverage in various news sources. North America1000 06:34, 6 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. In addition to the sources cited by North America, I also found "Surgical treatment of Double Chin in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery and a variety of more mundane pieces on the subject, such as this "The 10 Best Exercises to Reduce a Double Chin" in Livestrong. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 08:11, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. I think it is a sufficiently notable topic in terms of both society and medicine (plastic surgery) as evidenced by the sources provided above.  Deli nk (talk) 12:10, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a notable topic and has been mentioned in a lot of sources, e.g. CNN. πr2 (t • c) 05:45, 7 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.