Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douchebag


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. While small, consensus was keep (non-admin closure) Chrisw80 (talk) 06:12, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Douchebag

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:TWODABS because the only articles about topics named "Douchebag" are Douche and Douchebag (film). Of these two articles, Douche is clearly the long-term significant primary topic for "douchebag", so this disambiguation page should be redirected to the Douche article, with a hatnote pointing to Douchebag (film). Note: would an admin please help place an AFD template on this disambiguation page? It's fully protected. SST flyer 09:03, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:31, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Wow WP:OTHERPARENT much? There is an open move request at Talk:Douchebag that you started to move this page from the base title to Douchebag (disambiguation), so far only opposition has appeared (three editors-including myself). So you decide to nominate it for deletion instead? Really? Edit: I see that you have decided to withdraw the move request, however, that doesn't make this any less of a WP:forumshopping issue.
 * Keep; On topic, Speedy Keep at the very least until the move request is over with. the primary topic for "douchebag" is the pejorative term, not the orifice cleaner. Just because we don't have an article on something doesn't mean it isn't the primary topic. There may be only two articles about "douchebag" topics, but the pejorative term makes it three, meaning that WP:TWODABS doesn't support your argument.  InsertCleverPhraseHere  08:26, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as this seems convincing enough, not seriously needed for deletion I imagine. SwisterTwister   talk  04:31, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:10, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - Close this - Go to the talkpage and get this moved per PT. – Davey 2010 Talk 23:08, 6 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.