Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Davis (businessman)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Matt14451 (talk) 14:46, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Doug Davis (businessman)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Have given the promotional wording a NPOV makeover. Am struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources in the article or online. Run-of-the-mill businessman. Famous father, but WP:NOTINHERITED applies here. Promotional article, created by a WP:SPA. Edwardx (talk) 19:15, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep passes as there are clearly reputable, notable and reliable sources in the article from The Wall Street Journal, Billboard, Variety, ESPN and others. A basic web search sees an article on subject from Marketwatch today. Subject seems easily noteworthy and renown separate from family ties.   GaryFromGary (talk)  13:11, 24 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:21, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:21, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:22, 23 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep - after removing the spam, trivia, unsourced matters, BLP violations, and nonsense, I could determine that he's probably notable. If I were still an admin, I would consider long-term monitoring or protection. Bearian (talk) 01:15, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete I looked at the given references. Where is Doug significantly covered by an independent, reliable source? Dial911 (talk) 02:31, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:02, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - Certainly notable given accomplishments referenced in article, even moreso given current independant news stories on political album just release he apparently produced. ChocolateBabkaGirl (talk) 12:16, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - Editor who flagged edits primarily billionaires. While Doug is not apparently billionaire, he is obviously notable given sourcing. KnittingQueenKY (talk) 12:56, 29 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.