Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Derraugh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Mediran ( t  •  c ) 00:06, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Doug Derraugh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lacks notability. Relevant policy here: WP:NHOCKEY ♦ Tentinator ♦  07:53, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:41, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:41, 29 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Meets WP:NHOCKEY by playing in the DEL which is the top pro league in Germany and the top pro league in Austria. -DJSasso (talk) 15:19, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Derraugh was the 2010 NCAA Division 1 Coach of the Year — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.239.167.187 (talk) 16:12, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep: While I disagree that the German league is a top-flight league as we define at NHOCKEY, it's at least a second-tier league where 100 games is the qualifier, and the subject played over four hundred games in the German, Austrian and Italian leagues. More to the point, he played 29 games in the SM-liiga, which is a top-flight league and is an automatic qualifier on that front alone.    Ravenswing   22:01, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, per above. Patken4 (talk) 02:09, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep I really like User:Ravenswing's arguments regarding WP:NHOCKEY. What we also have to look at is the fact that he's been the "head coach" of an NCAA team that reached the championships, won the Ivy League, and was named Division 1 (NCAA) Coach of the Year, a very prestigious award . I believe WP:ANYBIO #1 addresses that. Mkdw talk 09:10, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.