Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Dutch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Randykitty (talk) 17:42, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Doug Dutch

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

First, Dutch has not played in a regular season game in a professional league and does not pass WP:NGRIDIRON. Second, he has not received national press coverage or won an award that would qualify under WP:NCOLLATH. Third, he has not been the subject of significant coverage in independent reliable sources so as to pass WP:GNG. He was not even a regular player at the collegiate level; according to the Michigan statistical database, he saw action in only four games (three in 2005, one in 2007). Cbl62 (talk) 19:20, 19 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Cbl62 (talk) 19:22, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Cbl62 (talk) 19:22, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Cbl62 (talk) 19:22, 19 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Based on Cbl62's reasoning.--Yankees10 03:13, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable college football player. Subject does not satisfy the specific notability guideline for college football players and other athletes per WP:NCOLLATH (no major records or awards), and fails the general notability guidelines per WP:GNG for lack of significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources.  There is a lot of WP:ROUTINE coverage, and there is some in-depth coverage out there, but it's not available on independent sources; what's there is recruiting sites, team team sites, draft sites, blogs, and fan-written content sites, all of which we discount heavily.  What is not there is significant coverage in mainstream news and sports sites and publications.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 23:22, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.