Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Engebretson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:52, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Doug Engebretson

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Cannot find any independent in-depth coverage or book reviews in reliable sources, either those in the article or elsewhere online - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NAUTHOR and WP:NACADEMIC. Run-of-the-mill person. Edwardx (talk) 18:02, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:04, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete the sources seem to be ones that mention his work, but not give him in-depth coverage per se. The sum total of what we have is not enough to justify an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:44, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article fails WP:GNG through lack of reliable sources that discuss him. Some minor coverage exists within the context of things he has written, but those mentions are very minor and do not show notability for the author himself. The article similarly fails WP:NAUTHOR. - Aoidh (talk) 22:51, 1 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.