Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Kammerer

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no vote. Need to wait longer than 2 weeks. Woohookitty 06:47, 13 July 2005 (UTC)

Doug Kammerer
not notable, information at WCAU-TV anchors - MERGE 203.98.57.97 3 July 2005 18:32 (UTC)


 * Merge and Redirect I've only heard of him because I live here. Not notable enough.--Alex12 3 3 July 2005 18:48 (UTC)
 * Also, the edits I made to the archived discussion were to stop this from showing twice on the July 3rd VfD page Contents menu. Please don't hurt me. Thanks. --Alex12 3 3 July 2005 18:48 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. This just survived a VFD a couple of weeks ago and is not eligible for another VFD at this time.  Sanction User:203.98.57.97 for bad-faith VFD nominations intended to WP:POINT. Kaibabsquirrel 3 July 2005 19:23 (UTC)
 * I agree with sanctioning user 203.98.57.97 for above reasons. However, my vote regarding the article stands. --Alex12 3 3 July 2005 20:55 (UTC)

Dude? Why is this guy in two places, I like him on the list of WCAU peeps. Can we put him there? I am thinking that you would say something like Speedy Merge to do it? Will that do it? PhillyDude! 3 July 2005 21:05 (UTC)
 * User's 11th edit, account created 1 July. Edit history looks like yet another of the multiple sockpuppet accounts playing their little disruption game with the East Coast TV  station articles. Kaibabsquirrel 3 July 2005 21:55 (UTC)
 * Oh, no - they're BAAaack. Hi guys.  --Mothperson 3 July 2005 23:53 (UTC)
 * PhillyDude! and 203.98.57.97 both :( The Spotctopus doesn't quit does it? Kaibabsquirrel 4 July 2005 00:19 (UTC)

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep due to no consensus. For those interested in vote count, I find 7 clearly "good" keep votes, and 9 clearly "good" delete votes. Sjakkalle (Check!)  07:45, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Doug Kammerer

Delete Person of very little importance, minor person on minor local TV. Spotteddogsdotorg 18:43, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Do we need every damn airhead weatherman from podunk's bio here? No! Hohokus 23:21, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * User's 24th edit, suspected sockpuppet. Kaibabsquirrel 21:58, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Local TV weather guy in small market - not notable! Melvis 17:11, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * User's 10th edit, suspected sockpuppet. Kaibabsquirrel 21:58, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Who? Not notable! Next! ShureMicGuy 19:08, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Account created today, all edits are to VfD. RickK 22:57, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: Marginal advertising, little content, no reasoning for why this person is signifiant. All local weathermen do the weather from a viewer's yard, sooner or later. Geogre 03:07, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, passes WP:BIO. Kappa 03:45, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep -- nightly weekday appearances on television make one notable. - Longhair | Talk 03:48, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. &#08492; astique&#09660; talk 05:19, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, does not pass WP:BIO. Neither a "widely recognized entertainment personality" nor a "well-known entertainment figure". --Smack (talk) 05:37, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable. JamesBurns 05:52, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Appears on local television only, and only on one channel. How many other weathermen for this channel have articles? I notice there's a Glenn "Hurricane" Schwartz one as well. Average Earthman 07:17, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep SchmuckyTheCat 16:10, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete I would understand if he was like Janice Huff and did weather on the Today show, but this guy is on some local station and isn;t of any notewortyness. ConeyCyclone 17:22, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Account created less than an hour before this vote was cast, suspected sockpuppet, user's 15th edit. Kaibabsquirrel 21:58, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Jinkleberries 19:56, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Note: Junkleberries is a new account today and voted 'keep' on 37 articles within a 7-minute period. This user also received a vandalism warning today.  Tobycat 20:53, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn. RickK 22:24, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, agree with Kappa Falphin 00:35, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. A local TV weatherman, and one who's been there for less than two years? NN. --Calton | Talk 04:12, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn vanity. No one cares if he eats hot dogs or not.  Grue  14:50, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep The Philadelphia broadcast area is large enough that "notable there" is "notable enough". --Unfocused 16:26, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, yet another frivolous VFD no thanks to User:Spotteddogsdotorg and multiple sockpuppet votes. Kaibabsquirrel 21:58, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable.  Regardless of how large Philadelphia is, a local TV weather hack on the station for 2 years is not notable.  Local TV personalities change jobs frequently and are rarely notable.  Quale 21:00, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .


 * Strong, Speedy Keep for integrity of VfD process; renomination too soon. Xoloz 4 July 2005 05:30 (UTC)
 * Merge/redir. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; July 4, 2005 09:15 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.