Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Kammerer (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  20:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Doug Kammerer
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO. Unable to locate any significant biographical details in secondary sources. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:20, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:20, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:20, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Weak delete: I found this article (part 1 part 2) that I think is somewhat in depth. But everything else I found is weird gossip type stuff like this. Other than that, I see nothing else that satisfies WP:GNG.  Bait30  Talk 2 me pls? 21:59, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions.   Bait30   Talk 2 me pls? 22:02, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Comment I would say that this article qualifies as biographical by a secondary source. Fbdave (talk) 22:19, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The source you cited an interview with Kammerer, so it is a primary source. Magnolia677 (talk) 06:28, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Ehh, with interviews it can go either way. On one hand, you're correct that anything the interviewee says is primary. On the other hand, the fact that a notable publication is giving a somewhat lengthy interview to this person should indicate some level of notability. In this case, the interview seems more like an easy, surface level interview and therefore shouldn't really be used as an indicator of notability.  Bait30   Talk 2 me pls? 08:01, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * There is also this article: Fbdave (talk) 12:56, 18 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete not even close to being notable. No, interviews are not in any way a source that adds toward passing GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:38, 18 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.