Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Truax


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 09:54, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Doug Truax

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly sourced (only one of the four cited sources actually passes the WP:RS test) WP:BLP of a person whose only substantiated notability is as an unsuccessful candidate in a party primary. As always, this is not a claim that passes WP:NPOL, and nothing else here is properly sourced enough to get him past a different inclusion standard instead. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 22:48, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wish him the best on his political ambitions, but he ain't there yet.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 01:33, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 31 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Outside the US presidential race, loosing a primary pretty much always means you are a non-notable politician at that level (although many failed senate candidates have held other notable offices). There might be exceptions for those with especially indepth coverage, but Traux lacks that. He may or may not do something to become notable in the future, but he has not yet.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:55, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete He lost a primary, there's nothing else to say about him really. Tiller54 (talk) 12:11, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete At best, WP:TOOSOON. John from Idegon (talk) 12:15, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Good nomination and yes he is not in the position right now.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 12:16, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.