Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Whiteman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Enigmamsg 05:06, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Doug Whiteman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm struggling to find significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Seems to me to fail WP:GNG and WP:NJOURNALIST. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 01:08, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 01:09, 17 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete I agree with your reasoning for deletion. Citing your own flickr account is a new one for me. †Basilosauridae  ❯❯❯Talk  04:33, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete This person is a run-of-the-mill working journalist. Most of the references are things written by him, and none are to reliable, independent sources devoting significant coverage to him. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  04:48, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. While the subject appears to be a fine journalist with one AP award, the article fails notability criteria. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 04:49, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:49, 17 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete looks like it was created as promotion. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 07:54, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Potentially promotional, no evidence of notability. ~ EDDY  ( talk / contribs ) ~ 01:35, 24 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.