Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug and Mary Lou Nemanic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:03, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Doug and Mary Lou Nemanic

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional and non notable. Too much of a personal memoir, so i assume there's considerable conflict of interest. I tried fixing it, but gave up if their project of their teamwork is indeed notable, the article would need to be rewritten completely, and the first step in doing that is to delete this and start over.  DGG ( talk ) 22:07, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * As the reviewer who accepted the article, I may have a little COI here. I'm neutral here. Regards-- JAaron95 Talk  00:51, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  JAaron95  Talk  00:53, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  JAaron95  Talk  00:53, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  JAaron95  Talk  00:53, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  JAaron95  Talk  00:53, 10 August 2015 (UTC)




 * Weak keep. The article has addressable issues with tone and format, but it appears the subjects meet WP:BASIC and WP:CREATIVE. So let's get it fixed, not deleted.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 01:56, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Guggenheim Award, United States Hockey Hall of Fame, one documentary has won a film festival category, the other is traveling academic circles and has aired on the metro-area cable channel. AfD Nomination does not meet WP:DEL-REASON, keep per WP:ATD. 009o9 (talk) 19:11, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * ehhh Keep- But it needs some serious cleaning up to do. The article is much too long for the amount of sources that exist for it. -Xcuref1endx (talk) 10:57, 13 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.