Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas Cordeaux


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:36, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Douglas Cordeaux

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The news articles supporting the article are about Ms Meaden (Dragon's Den fame) with Cordeaux mentioned tangentially as her friend. Being a Creative Director or a Managing Director is not a guarantee of encyclopaedic notability and though the Company might be a suitable topic for an article the individual appears to fail the WP:NOTNEWS policy. Searching GNews and excluding matches to Meaden shows two matches which would not be significant enough to justify an article. GBooks shows no matches. Fæ (talk) 23:09, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- Fæ (talk) 23:10, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: I attempted to improve this stub a few weeks ago, but none of the sources I found and added give very significant coverage of Cordeaux. He probably doesn't meet the notability guidelines. I was planning to nominate it for deletion myself if no-one else improved it soon.--Physics is all gnomes (talk) 23:27, 5 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can find passing mentions and some quotes from him, but nothing substantial enough to meet notability. -- Whpq (talk) 17:05, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.