Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas J. Den Uyl


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. W.marsh 17:33, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Douglas J. Den Uyl

 * View single debate
 * View single debate

fails WP:PROF two relatively uncited books on a literary figure does not justify the stub. Buridan 14:31, 2 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Neutral it may be that the guy does pass the test but Wikipedia hasn't done enough research on him. ---*- u:Chazz/contact/t: 15:11, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * yes the stubness indicates to me, given the length of time its existed, that no one cares to work on it.  However, if you google him, you get very little and google scholar gives his most cited work under 20 citations. --Buridan 16:02, 2 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable academic. -- Chondrite 21:15, 6 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable, with no prejudice against recreation with reliable sources that prove notability. --AbsolutDan (talk) 00:38, 7 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.