Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas Michael Lloyd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 00:27, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Douglas Michael Lloyd

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete. Non-notable. I'm usually in inclusionist for Wikipedia, but there is no reason for this guy to have an article when all the other Public School Trustees no not. He is non notable because he is only a School Trustee. -- Earl Andrew - talk 18:58, 14 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete he is just a school caretaker, absolutely non notable UltraMagnusspeak 20:50, 14 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment. He is probably more notable as an IT executive than as a school board official. In fact, many elected members of school boards may be more notable in their day jobs than as school trustees. At this point, I can't justify keeping the article, although some of the speaking engagements seem to hint notability. -- Eastmain (talk) 21:56, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions.  -- Eastmain (talk) 22:25, 14 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete No sources, not encyclopedic. The Ottawa News source is not even an in depth significant source, it simply mentiones subject name. WildHorsesPulled (talk) 22:32, 14 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. For disclosure's sake, the creator of this article approached me for guidance with it back when it was still a sandbox — but my response, which can be seen at User talk:Spuds McGoo, was that it wasn't a very good idea in the first place. Bearcat (talk) 23:02, 14 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:POLITICIAN flat out, insufficient coverage to meet WP:BIO. Ray  Talk 03:30, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.