Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas Stauffer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. G12 copyvio. Tim Song (talk) 23:57, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Douglas Stauffer

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Article appears to fail Notability (people). Article was tagged for notability on Jan 28. Google searching doesn't indicate that he has been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject. He has authored several books, some of which are self published. I can't find evidence of their notability and consequently his notability as an author either. He was a consulting editor for 'The New Pilgrim Bible, KJV By Oxford University Press' but other than that his name doesn't seem to come up in RS.  Sean.hoyland  - talk 03:43, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:33, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:34, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:34, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unambiguous copyvio of http://www.mccowenmills.com/dr-douglas-stauffer.htm - why has this remained since 2006? Anyway, the subject is President of McCowen Mills Publishers, who publish his books. That virtually makes him a self-published author. Non-notable. StAnselm (talk) 09:49, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete under CSD G12. Article tagged as such. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:49, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.