Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas Wemyss Solicitors


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:15, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Douglas Wemyss Solicitors

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Sources are either weak local ones or dead national ones. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:54, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 29 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete fails all of my standards, as well as WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG. Law firms are supposed to represent defendants, and often get in local newspapers for such.  The firm is very new, as law firms go; I've been admitted to practice since 1992.  I can't see how this is anything more than run of the mill.  The article is written as an advert, not an encyclopedia article - to get there we'd have to blow it up and start from scratch. Bearian (talk) 18:46, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, unremarkable law firm. Wikipedia is not the Yellow Pages.TheLongTone (talk) 18:09, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.