Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas zanders


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 15:00, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Douglas zanders

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Seems to fails WP:N (6 sources available, non usable), WP:NPOV and WP:SOURCE Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 14:16, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete par being the nominator Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 14:16, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete for lack of sources. Given that Zanders is said to have been active at least into the late 90's, he should have left a somewhat wider electronic trail. As is, the article's content is unverifiable. Huon (talk) 14:23, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I turned down the speedy request, as there is a claim of notability, but it's not a strong one and there's no verification. --Dweller (talk) 14:43, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per all the above. Fails WP:N and WP:V Jasynnash2 (talk) 15:27, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.   —David Eppstein (talk) 20:53, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The article has had three sources added since the nomination. Zanders meets verifiability criteria, however he looks marginal on notability. I'm neutral on this one.- gadfium 22:26, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'm not convinced by these sources. One does not confirm what is claimed in the article, the others provide next to no context. While they may satisfy verifiability criteria (though none of them even verify Zanders' birthday, for example), he still looks non-notable to me. Huon (talk) 23:26, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.