Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DownThemAll!


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Sam Blanning(talk) 19:22, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

DownThemAll!
Non-notable program, fails (for all I can tell) WP:SOFTWARE and WP:CORP, article reads like an advertisement, no reliable sources given (and no, the DownThemAll! homepage does not count). Contested prod. Delete Huon 20:44, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete I use this and find it quite useful, but like most Firefox extensions it probably doesn't pass WP:SOFTWARE on its own. Perhaps a mention in an article about FF extensions or download managers would suffice. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  20:55, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete for the same reasons as Andrew Lenahan. I also think that it would merit a mention in articles on Firefox extensions and/or download managers. Thryduulf 21:56, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. I'm no expert on software notability policies but this is probably one of the more widely known and widely used Firefox extensions. I don't even use Firefox and I've heard of it. --Rankler 10:28, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep 160,000 Googlehits. :) Dlohcierekim 01:21, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.