Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Downs/Archambault


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. --F a ng Aili 說嗎? 05:06, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Downs/Archambault
Not a specific architect, it's a firm; reads like a business card or yellow pages entry; Brianporter 00:51, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete article seems to say that the firm isn't that notable based on the limited amount of projects that the company has participated in; google gives no non-wikipedia hits for the term  Wh e  re  (talk) 01:48, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) delete self-promotion Williamb 03:29, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Appears to fail WP:CORP, unless someone can find some press coverage of them. Fagstein 05:33, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, too minor for inclusion. Quatloo 09:33, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn, fails WP:CORP, 0 Google hits besides Wikipedia, nn. --Ter e nce Ong 11:10, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete ad  Funky Monkey    (talk)   18:56, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete because non-notable, although I would say that Googling "Downs Archambault" without the slash returns some significant hits, including this entry: (http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=A1ARTA0002382). --Lockley 21:41, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, does not meet WP:CORP. Wstaffor 22:51, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, per the link Lockley provided. -Objectivist-C 00:02, 19 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.