Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Downtownies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  An as  talk? 22:15, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Downtownies

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Apparently non-notable online television show. Only about 500 Google hits. Edited almost exclusively by a single-purpose account. I smell a vanity article. —Psychonaut 20:32, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not meet WP:WEB and also looks like cruft. -- Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor  ( ταlκ )  20:37, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete It looks like a bad article. Assuming that the nom has his facts right, delete. Shalom Hello 20:40, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as nominator. —Psychonaut 20:48, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lacking any reliable, third-party sources and evidencing no notability.  —   pd_THOR  undefined | 20:54, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per everyone. Fails WP:WEB. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  22:45, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No assertion of notability, and no sources cited. —  Wen li  (contribs) 01:58, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, per failure to meet WP:WEB. This one is similar to Sim Street, both are non-notable fan cruft with no supporting 3rd party reviews. Subject of article is not really even a TV show, just a set of screen caps with dialog by them. Looks like a vanity article,as the same SPAs were creating a walled garden of articles Sim Brother, Crystal Town and Sim Media possibly to promote their site or for some other vanity purpose. --Dual Freq 05:04, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete the other pages if you must, but the Sim Media page shouldn't be deleted on the grounds that it isn't simply a 'fan cruft' (whatever that means. )It is a real fansite, and there was no call for any deletion of it before article on the shows it hosts were made. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jamster 4 (talk • contribs).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 15:32, 26 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.