Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Downward Mobility and Divorce


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy userfy to User:Gopherfan/downward mobility and divorce. Part of a bit of freeloading by this author, Wojci028 and Spygirl86. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 16:22, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Downward Mobility and Divorce
Nominated because till now no substantial content has been put up. Shovon (talk) 11:38, 8 May 2008 (UTC) keep: It is fairly weak right now but I will be adding more stuff until about noon today. It is an assignment for a class I am taking and my prof wanted us to make a wiki article out of it. So it will be up and sourced within the day. I am a newbie at this so after I finish if there is any tweaking you want to do, then go for it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.146.153.158 (talk) 14:31, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep: I would disagree that "no substantial content" has been put up. I do agree that this is a weakly sourced essay that looks like a WP:NOR violation, and you could infer from nom's language that this was something put up last year and has been dangling ever since.  Wrong: nom filed a speedy eleven minutes after the article's creation, allowing for no time for improvement or proper sourcing.  If this article is unimproved a month from now, then deletion would be warranted, but this level of misdirection does the process no good.    Ravenswing  13:56, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * weak keep - the article now has some content (it didn't when the AfD was put up) and I suspect that a good article could be created. As it stands at this instant, however, it is unsourced and appears to have lots of original research.  I would give it at least a little longer to see if the article can be made into something useful. Wrs1864 (talk) 14:22, 8 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.