Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doxia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 08:48, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Doxia

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A sub-project of a project; not notable. Ironholds (talk) 19:04, 7 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. Wikipedia has numerous useful articles on Apache Software Foundation projects.  There is precedent for including subprojects as well; see Apache Ivy.  It would be purely arbitrary to exclude Doxia under the rationale given.  Lucky Bottlecap (talk) 19:46, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I tagged this in hopes of it being fixed. Bearian (talk) 17:16, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 12 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete where is the non-trivial coverage from reliable third parties? JBsupreme (talk) 08:43, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete no assertion of notability. --Blowdart | talk 11:52, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. I have added two print references which I believe are sufficient for inclusion. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 17:47, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Appears to be a non-notable defunct project -- no apparent development after 2007 and nothing but an alpha then. Looie496 (talk) 22:04, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment It is active as a component of Apache Maven though not as an independent subproject. Lucky Bottlecap (talk) 13:26, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per refs by Morven. The project seems to be notable from its variety of uses. -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 09:41, 14 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.