Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doxy (vibrator)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  EN  - Jungwon  06:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Doxy (vibrator)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Low notability, reads almost purely as an advertisement. AtomCrusher (talk) 20:48, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:59, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:59, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:59, 5 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Merge to Wand vibrator as written, but I would note that Hitachi Magic Wand, though much lengthier, is not particularly less promotional. BD2412  T 22:04, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep As even a quick web search will show, this clearly meets the WP:GNG criteria, plenty of mainstream coverage of both the product and the company that makes it: see, , , . . -- The Anome (talk) 11:57, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, per the sources provided by, but is it the brand or the company that is notable? Is a rename to CMG Leisure in order? SailingInABathTub (talk) 14:26, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: I'd say the two were synonymous, as the company's only products are the Doxy brand sex toys, of which the big wand vibrators are the flagship product. -- The Anome (talk) 17:55, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per prior. As for content issues, I'm not sure 'promotional' is the issue so much as 'stub'. "Described as X", with attribution, usually isn't promotionalism alone; it's just that the article is 64 words long, so 13 of them is quite a bit. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 15:18, 12 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.