Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doyen Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:31, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Doyen Group

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Badly written advertisement for a commercial scheme, the references mainly lead to press releases. Nixie9 ✉  22:43, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 2 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep It is hard to dig out source, but the name of the company did appeared in Portuguese media and official website of F.C. Porto, thus it is not a hoax. The Ad tone was reverted by me to my stable version, feel free to edit and improve it. Matthew_hk   t  c  07:06, 2 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Matthew_hk   t  c  07:07, 2 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - shadowy company involved in football transfers somehow? Non-notable. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG? Non-notable. GiantSnowman 08:33, 2 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment For GNG. bloomberg had a reasonable long article about the fund and bloomberg claimed that they asked the supervisor of the fund to response, did it a reasonable large coverage on the fund? Matthew_hk   t  c  02:41, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Although notability could not be inherited, I added the hotel section which seems notable, but you could say it is arbitrarily that the parent company of the hotel group is notable or not. Matthew_hk   t  c  06:32, 3 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - relevant football information can be merged to football club articles and/or player articles. I do not see the company to satisfy general notability. --MicroX (talk) 07:19, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.