Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doyle Clayton Barnes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to USS Doyle C. Barnes. Consensus that the topic is not notable. Any useful content is preserved in the page history and may be merged into other articles as deemed appropriate. (non-admin closure) (t &#183; c)  buidhe  13:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Doyle Clayton Barnes

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG as a one-time recipient of the Navy Cross. Lettlerhello • contribs 16:47, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 16:47, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 16:47, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 16:47, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 16:47, 23 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep A warship was named after him which is a "significant award or honor and so passes WP:ANYBIO. Andrew🐉(talk) 18:44, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to USS Doyle C. Barnes. Fails WP:SOLDIER (Ensign awarded a Navy Cross. Having a ship named after him during WWII is not a "significant award or honor") and WP:GNG. No SIGCOV in multiple RS so not notable. Mztourist (talk) 03:38, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge to USS Doyle C. Barnes. I concur he doesn't meet NBIO/NSOLDIER but there is some mergeable content here (sadly there are no inline refs in the article, but we an probably AGF the content...). The ship can have a section about its non-notable namesake.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:36, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete when the navy is churning out ships left and right and feels a need to name them after someoone immediately on launch, having one named after you is not a significant award or honor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:43, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect and Merge to USS Doyle C. Barnes, it's more appropriate to have relevant information about a ship's namesake in the ship's article than a completely separate article. Best, GPL93 (talk) 14:17, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge selectively into USS Doyle C. Barnes. Does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:NSOLDIER.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:46, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to USS Doyle C. Barnes, fails GNG. Cavalryman (talk) 02:43, 2 February 2021 (UTC).


 * Redirect As per above suggessted. Setreis (talk) 07:58, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to USS Doyle C. Barnes. Does not meet WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG. Lack of significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Ashley  yoursmile!  08:08, 2 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.