Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doyle King


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:54, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Doyle King

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Long unsourced article about a subject with no reliable secondary sources. Kevin (talk) 05:04, 29 November 2010 (UTC) Delete, unable to find any non-trivial coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject of this unreferenced biography of a living person. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. — J04n(talk page) 16:33, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note - Article is not long (barely a stub), and was not long when nominated. I'm disinclined to argue an AfD if the nominator isn't going to take the time to correctly describe the article. Nevertheless... - DustFormsWords (talk) 06:32, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Long as in unsourced for a long time is what I meant. Kevin (talk) 10:34, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article provides no sources establishing notability and my good faith searches were unable to uncover any except for repeated mentions on Unticket.com, which appear to be neither indpedent nor reliable. - DustFormsWords (talk) 06:32, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 07:34, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I did a long look online hoping to find anything and didnt find a WP:RS for this person. i did find this however. Unfortunately, one of those times when Justia doesnt finish out so cant be sure if its the same person. Wolfstorm000 (talk) 03:55, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as this biography cannot apparently cross either the verifiability or notability thresholds. - Dravecky (talk) 10:07, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.