Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dpjudge

Dpjudge was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to delete. Cool Hand Luke  06:51, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Non-notable website description. Mikkalai 20:24, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete. Vanity. Guus 21:03, Sep 10, 2004 (UTC)
 * Unresolved/lost VfD. Absurdly unnotable. Delete. Cool Hand Luke  02:56, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Gah. Delete. - Vague Rant 04:38, Oct 30, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Man alive! It takes a serious disconnect to think this needs space in an encyclopedia.  Geogre 13:26, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete webvert. Gazpacho 01:06, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * It's more than a bit notable, if you play Diplomacy, so I vote for keep and I have made some edits to the article. Another option would be merging with Njudge. --Pjacobi 01:07, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not vanity, but insufficiently notable to be encyclopedic, and I am a Diplomacy player.  Parent article gives sufficient explanation of Judges and DPjudge; this article isn't needed.  WP isn't a web guide nor a gaming reference in which it would be reasonable to expect searches for "DPjudge". Barno 15:19, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Del. Its info belongs within a larger article, presumably the one Barno cites. --Jerzy(t) 23:52, 2004 Nov 3 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.