Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drückender Tango (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 15:17, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Drückender Tango
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

One line, none notable book. Suggest redirecting to Herta Müller. Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. No reference cited. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 14:03, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 14:03, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 14:25, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 14:25, 21 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. Satisfies criteria 5 of the guideline WP:NBOOK. The author won a nobel prize for literature. You can't use an essay to reject a guideline, especially when the essay is garbage. James500 (talk) 18:02, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
 * You can easily merge it to the author's page. There's no references used in the article. Plus, there's no indication she won it on /that/ book. Plus the page is just a stub and tells nothing of the book. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 18:04, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the author's article. These micro bot-stubs do not serve a purpose. -- » Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  12:39, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per James 500. I've expanded the article a little bit, using only English-language sources. I'd expect there to be more sources available in German. Mortee (talk) 16:05, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Expect? Is this one of those find a unicorn thing of expectation? --Tyw7</i>  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 21:26, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * no. It's because it's a German book by a Nobel Prize winner. You'd expect more German sources than English ones. I haven't gone looking because German's not my native language, I was able to add some content without them, and there's a huge number of AfD nominations open just at the moment that I'd like to give some attention to. Mortee (talk) 21:52, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * The article certainly looks better now. And it's more informative to readers. --<i style="font-family:'Rock salt','Comic Sans MS'; color: Green;">Tyw7</i>  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 21:56, 23 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep, meets WP:NBOOK, as indicated by, and the article improvements made by , it is also written about elsewhere ie. Herta Müller: Politics and Aesthetics (a mention) and review of Sprachtakt. Herta Müllers literarischer Darstellungsstil. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:04, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:24, 26 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.