Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. ARK Pillai


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedied by User:Jimfbleak. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-08 10:26Z 

Dr. ARK Pillai

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Entirely uncited, does not meet WP:BIO, and heavily biased RHB Talk - Edits 21:27, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Looks suspiciously like spam. I totally agree with RHB. Also: the user entering the article is brand-new, there are only about 5 mentioning of the ILF in Google. This article either needs a complete rewrite or deletion. My preference is deletion. HagenUK 21:37, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Google search suggests that sources exist, but most seem to be unreliable or non-independent. Agree with HagenUK and RHB. --N Shar 21:38, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * keep
 * comment. If documented N is evident. Placing an unsourced tag would be the appropriate action.DGG 00:38, 4 February 2007 (UTC) However, the only other article from this editor " Indian Development Foundation" has just been removed  by speedy as a blatant copyright violation, so this one should be checked as well. DGG 01:01, 4 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete. I hate articles like these with a vengeance. Tagged as WP:CSD Ohconfucius 09:21, 5 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.