Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. B.R. Ambedkar State Institute of Medical Sciences


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Keeping based on the cases presented below - sources appear to help the subject pass WP:GNG.

Thank you everyone for participating and assuming good faith. If you disagree with this decision, please take your objections and concerns to Deletion Review instead of my talk page. Thanks again and happy holidays! Missvain (talk) 23:48, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Dr. B.R. Ambedkar State Institute of Medical Sciences

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A newly opened college wants a promotion. Does not pass WP:NORG / WP:GNG, lacks reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Based on No original research. DMySon (talk) 03:41, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 03:41, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 03:41, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 03:41, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 03:41, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: From the sheer depth of reliable News coverage provided, it is clear that the subject of the article passes WP:GNG  Padavalam🌂   ►  05:13, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: A government run medical college and this is also a functional Hospital with patients. Passes Notability of schools based on the available coverage. It is also known as Mohali Medical College Venkat TL (talk) 18:54, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
 * delete From what I can tell all the references are either primary and (or) extremely trivial. I was thinking the article by The Tribune might be usable, but it's an interview. So it's not usable for notability. Also the article is clearly a PR puff piece and I don't see that changing with the references we currently have access to. Really, this article should have created after the university was around for a while. Most universities that just opened aren't going to have sufficient coverage to be notable. So it's no surprise that this one doesn't. Maybe create a draft for it in 6 months and send it through AfC just to be on the safe side. --Adamant1 (talk) 14:21, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Adamant1, if you want Draftify, why then are you voting for delete? see WP:ATD Venkat TL (talk) 14:44, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't want to draft it. I was just suggesting it as an ATD for the article creator incase they do. I assume they are watching this. --Adamant1 (talk) 14:47, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   09:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep the sources provided satisfy WP:GNG for this medical college and hospital. Polyamorph (talk) 23:10, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. You're right that it's a newly opened school that probably really wants this article, but they still clearly pass WP:NORG and WP:GNG. Cycling this through AfC would be completely and utterly useless; I'm an AfC reviewer and this would probably be an accept based on the sources currently present. We don't need to clog up the backlog even more by draftifying. Chess (talk) (please use&#32; on reply) 20:27, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'm content with the sources currently in the article:, , and are reliable Indian sources that discuss the college/hospital in depth, and that's sufficient to establish notability, particularly since additional sources likely exist in foreign languages. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:32, 30 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.