Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. B.R. Sur Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital and Research Centre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Despite the plethora of socks, the only person who wants to keep this is the WP:SPA creator.  Sandstein  08:26, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Dr. B.R. Sur Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital and Research Centre

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

All the article shows is that it exists as a clinic that gives out psuedo science laden homeopathic cures. Nothing makes it notable MistyGraceWhite (talk) 15:16, 3 May 2020 (UTC) Nominator's comment struck; indefinitely banned sockpuppet.--Goldsztajn (talk) 20:34, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

keep The article shows that it exists as government college and hospital in Delhi supported by the Government of Delhi and is affiliated to Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University. The pseudo science of homeopathy has a governing council of its own in India, the central council of homeopathy under its very own ministry called Ministry of AYUSH. The government of India's recognition as well as affiliation to Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University makes it notable. Kunalsharma351 (talk) 15:44, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:49, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:49, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:50, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:50, 3 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:ORGCRIT due to lack of detailed coverage. Cedix (talk) 19:57, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Alternative to deletion- If the topic seems not worthy of its own article in other words not notable, then I would like to propose for it to be merged with the article "List of colleges affiliated with Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University" rather than being deleted. keeping in mind that the institution the article talks about is indeed an affiliate of the Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University Kunalsharma351 (talk) 11:26, 4 May 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Commentary about the possible alternative to deletion would be helpful in establishing consensus.
 * Delete - as per nom, nothing to indicate notability. WP:MILL. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 00:38, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:14, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment - the subject is already listed in that list (see alternative to deletion above). I don’t see what content in this article would be worthy of merging. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 07:55, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment - Considering the fact that the subject talks about an educational institution of homeopathy run by the government, affiliated to a public university, which enrols students every year through a national medical entrance test NEET, makes it interesting enough to be on this platform. I can agree that it may not be worthy of its own article that's why i suggest it to be merged. After all a little information on a topic widely searched by students in India every year on the colleges is better than nothing. It may not seem that notable on an international level, but i believe that on a national level there are a lot of people searching regarding information about institutions providing homeopathy as a course every year. Kunalsharma351 (talk) 19:34, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Whether or not is it an “interesting” topic is irrelevant, there must be reliable sources to back up its claims. Have a look at WP:N and WP:RS to see what standards articles must meet on Wikipedia. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 19:55, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment. I have reopened this discussion, which was closed by a major contributor to the article. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:00, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

'speedy keep it is notableEasytostable (talk) 10:08, 17 May 2020 (UTC)  Blocked sock. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 18:29, 25 May 2020 (UTC)  Comment struck from indefinitely banned sockpuppet.--Goldsztajn (talk) 20:34, 28 May 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   18:47, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

keep The article is notable. Kunalsharma351 (talk) 17:31, 25 May 2020 (UTC) — Kunalsharma351 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Note: @User:Kunalsharma351 Has already voted keep above, this is a second vote. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 18:33, 25 May 2020 (UTC) Comment struck from indefinitely banned sockpuppet.--Goldsztajn (talk) 20:34, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:ORGCRIT. Inadequate coverage. Arunram (talk) 13:45, 28 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.