Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Biju


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  20:23, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Dr. Biju

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a promotional autobiography, created by the subject and edited by him under two different but similar usernames, and  plus likely sockpuppet WP:SPA. With the exception of trivial fixes, almost all content has been written by the subject. Guy (Help!) 07:14, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:17, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:17, 23 October 2016 (UTC)


 * delete per nom, I don't trust that REFBOMB at all - David Gerard (talk) 11:39, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * keep That the piece is autobiographical does not change the fact that the subject is very notable. He is a national award winning director and thus one of the top filmmakers in India today. In such a situation, the issues related to autobiographical nature must be dealt with by removing questionable content rather than deleting the article altogether. -- Raziman T V (talk) 07:50, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: Notable per ml:Bijukumar Damodaran. Need to be updated by neutral editors. J e e  08:09, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * For this we have WP:TNT... Guy (Help!) 08:32, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * We don't have copyvio issues here. Just point out the sections of the article which seem undue or over-autobiographical and remove them. Deleting the whole article about such a notable person and waiting for someone else to come and rewrite it is bad policy -- Raziman T V (talk) 10:04, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The bit after the name and before the References section at the bottom. That's the part written by the subject for promotional purposes. Guy (Help!) 11:30, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 16:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Dane 2007  talk 05:16, 8 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.