Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Charles Brackett


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Avi 17:57, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Dr. Charles Brackett
Notability not asserted. Article appears to be copied from a book review about a surgeon. Medtopic 01:11, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails to meet verifiability standards. Seems non notable and does not meet WP:BIO requirements. Just because he was involved in the American Civil War does not make him notable.  --Strothra 01:40, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Comes up on several Civil War reference sites, e.g. [|here], [|here], [|here]; also referenced at American Civil War. RidG -T- 01:44, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No reliable sources or assertion of notability for a biographical entry, only a single book with a 1.5M Amazon rating, well below the WP notablity threshold. Crum375 01:50, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - I think we should overturn the pop-bias in WP, but I can't see how this army doctor did anything unusual or was of high rank.Blnguyen | rant-line 02:52, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, not really any more notable than any other field surgeon. Doesn't seem to be remarkable per verifiability standards. --Coredesat talk 04:35, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep on the same grounds as -T-, but as long as it gets a good rewrite. Black-Velvet  09:51, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete actually it was 1860. WP:VER.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.