Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. E.Gadd

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was redirect to Professor E. Gadd. -- Scott ei&#960;  06:26, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)

Dr. E.Gadd
The title, clone page. Need I say more? -- A Link to the Past 14:27, May 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as fancruft before anyone wikifies it. Martg76 18:40, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, character appearing in multiple games. Kappa 21:58, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
 * The reason this is up for deletion is because this is an incorrect page. The correct page is Professor E. Gadd, and it has all of the info listed at this page on it already, so Delete is the only logical option. -- A Link to the Past 23:11, May 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * LOL, couldn't you have just redirected it? Kappa 01:54, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Um, let's see.
 * 1) It's a typo title.
 * 2) At no point is he ever referred to as a Doctor. We might as well make a page called Baron Von Bowser. -- A Link to the Past 02:38, May 22, 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) That's a good reason for a redirect.
 * 4) We shouldn't, but if such a page is made someone is obviously confused and the redirect would be helpful to that person, at least.  In addition, it would discourage further creation of the mistakenly named page. -- Jonel 00:09, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirected to Professor E. Gadd, which should have been done in the first place. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 02:12, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, duplicate information, cruft. Megan1967 04:42, 22 May 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.