Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. K. Jeffrey Miller


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. (non-admin closure) L3X1 (distænt write)   )evidence(  02:04, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Dr. K. Jeffrey Miller

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Once the self-published sources from his business at examdoc.com are stripped away all that's left is an associate assistant professorship which fails WP:NACADEMIC. Cabayi (talk) 07:16, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 07:18, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 07:19, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 07:20, 2 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. I can't see any contribution to medical science. Else, just promotional. Xxanthippe (talk) 10:06, 2 August 2017 (UTC).
 * Do not Delete Removing content from ExamDoc.com, adding more content from outside sources. Benjaminjsmiller (talk) 13:51, 2 August 2017 (UTC)benjaminjsmillerBenjaminjsmiller (talk) 13:51, 2 August 2017 (UTC) — Benjaminjsmiller (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic..
 * Do you have any WP:COI here? Xxanthippe (talk) 22:31, 2 August 2017 (UTC).
 * Delete. Article is promotional garbage and the subject is nowhere near notability. I don't think WP:NACADEMIC even applies: his degrees are from dubious institutions, his publications are all in chiropractic pseudoscience, and I can't find a reliable source to verify that he is an assistant professor at Missouri. And as far as I can tell there are no independent sources that would count towards the WP:GNG. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 09:07, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. The subject appears to have published a few books and has a column in a magazine but the only source providing coverage is his own website. There isn't really anything to suggest notability when judged against WP:BASIC or WP:NACADEMIC. Drchriswilliams (talk) 08:11, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Plenty of reference BY him. Nothing ABOUT him. A VOA piece was a short review of a book. Rhadow (talk) 21:01, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete a totally non-notable chiropractor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:44, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - a run of the mill chiropractor and an allegedly prolific scholar who's been cited exactly once according to Google scholar. This is bordering on spam. Bearian (talk) 01:14, 8 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.