Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Manish Joshi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:14, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Dr. Manish Joshi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Vanity page for a gastroenterologist. Nothing more than a CV or résumé, with only primary sources that are either a CV or résumé. No substantial coverage in independent, reliable sources Mduvekot (talk) 13:51, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   FITINDIA   16:06, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:01, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete As per nom. The article only carries two primary sources that are not independent of the subject. There are many unsourced claims within the article. A search shows there are other individuals with this name but did not reveal reliable independent coverage of the medical doctor. Notability has not been established when judged against WP:BASIC. Drchriswilliams (talk) 21:29, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  07:30, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: The CV of a doctor who is senior consultant and head of department at a hospital: neither position is indicative of encyclopaedic notability and my searches are finding nothing better. Fails WP:BASIC, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 09:23, 27 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: Promotional piece. No encyclopedic value. I found a few passing mentions and clarifications for his hospitals but they don't satisfy WP:GNG. --Skr15081997 (talk) 13:24, 29 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.