Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Vivek Kumar Pandey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Comments in support do not relate to notability as defined by Wikipedia. Espresso Addict (talk) 06:08, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Dr. Vivek Kumar Pandey

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

A man who has got a doctorate and is doing research. Fine, good: but there's no indication that the research has yet blossomed into books or renown. When that happens, he'll merit an article; but for now, I'm afraid he's nn. (The article was prodded, but in view of this pair of edits I removed the prod notices.) Hoary (talk) 09:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - just a CV for a postdoc. If he does become a leader of humanity on International Level he can have an article, but for the moment he's not notable. Iain99Balderdash and piffle 09:33, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - I wish the guy luck, but he is not important.--Conjoiner (talk) 19:02, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —Iain99Balderdash and piffle 19:46, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Iain99. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:47, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment in this edit, 220.227.207.12 added the following within an SGML comment: Please remain the article as such all the things in the nature is not visible but why we feel its existance as voice and poetry have its effect when one reads and have its own realization if he have experienced the same condition in life, like the same Dr. Pandey is not only Science person and academic but he has influnced many person in his life, please see his social orkut page where he used to say boldly all the thing in indian society by writing own srap on own page, In this terrorist era he is bold academic person I request you please see his orkut page by searching"Dr. Vivek Kumar Pandey" by opening an acount in orkut. I realy influenced by his phylosophy and knowledege he have in various [erspective of Indian as well common world life. (Hoary (talk) 00:15, 25 January 2008 (UTC))
 * Comment User:Dr. vivek Kumar Pandey was a contributor to Dr. P.C. Pandey, NCAOR, now a redirect to Prem C. Pandey, whose biography also appears in the user page User:Ekbal anuj, belonging to somebody who has written about V K Pandey and P C Pandey. The article on the latter had a stunning mishmash of external links till I tried to clear them up; in its present state, it still links to this alumni association list, which has very terse mentions of each of fifty or so people and considerably longer entries for three other people, two of whom are Prem Chand Pandey and Vivek Kumar Pandey. I wonder if all of this is merely coincidental. -- Hoary (talk) 08:58, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/India. -- Hoary (talk) 09:06, 25 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. article is sub-literate, ill-spelt. Subject is extremely non-notable. Xxanthippe (talk) 11:03, 25 January 2008 (UTC).
 * Hang on. If the writing is poor (and I'd agree), that's neither a reason to term it "sub-literate" nor a reason to delete. -- Hoary (talk) 11:12, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete due to lack of notability. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 14:02, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete for reasons above  RT |  Talk  11:31, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

The Article is Notable for comming generation who are now even not obeying his parrents and have no any faith in his own country and migration is not a solution from trerrorist effected areas, How many peoples load wiil be carriable by itself trerrorist effected area, the minimum 25 % bold person in the every field should neccesary to make human kind safe. In the Global world due to terrorist attack migration of all people is not nessary, and bold and intteligent people should stay in each and every part of world even in Afganistan and Pakistan if in America and Britaniya. Altimately world is like a neural network as in case of atmosphere and bio-system. Acording to Shrimadbhagvat Geeta" Every sole have equal Energy" means every one can make usefull by guiding them and it is professional word that on top person are fair but coocks have also its importance, and according to nature of India which climate of India allow, the Indian Culture should be according to the same manner and then man can servive in that invioronment, thus India Should remain as India and Indian in India should remain as Indian is order of Nature not POnga Panthi Pandits staement but reality. Any culture is originated by the person who have experience to process of servivance in that climate. Thus according to Pandey, as as I have interacted with his Arabian Culture is best for remaining in Arabia and Western Culture is one of the best for survive in Population as Open sex in Western country other wise the loss theire population and will be forced to adapt Children from India and China where inteligent brain baby easily availabe form Orphan Missionaries(Anath Ashram so called in India). These of his thoughts and preachment between Higher education can solve the problem of terrorrist not bu gun system and force, but he don't denie the Armed force usses for person border security and hard work for development, The person who belives on such higher thoughts of Vishva Bandhutva and Panchsheel of India and have staement that he can talk with any terrorrist in close room for reform is a bold step in favour of humanity, may God blesh him. I request you let it remain as such. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.200.35.12 (talk) 08:45, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

The service of Pandey at a new established centre KBCAOS was to make student happy at the centre which was under Interdiscilinary form and Teachers in Faculty have no any Idea of the subject at that time and they where involved in their cooresponding departments and it was an extra load bu seeing the population of Uttar Pradesh the skilled student for Job in standard Institute in India and Foreigh Lab. and Industries was necessary keeping in mind the Centre and 3 Institute were started by meeting happend between local highly experienced Academician to give the hard core man power to soft core in UP as UP have highest population and have brilient student but without resources, the in this time also follow the old method of job, clerck and Officers and teachers at primary and Intermediate leve. The person who have experience of Handeling students was necessary who friendly behave with good scholars selected at centre of the Institutes in which IIDS was on reserch orientted and may be lab orientted in Industris at Master level. The High computation Faciality Centre KBCAOS was on top priority at the University of Allahabad and politics was also against the centre as the money used was although no in doubt but place of centre KBCAOS was in dispute, Dr. Pandey(Mr. at that time) Ex-Student of BHU Varanasi and experienced person of Mess in Ram Krishna hostel BHU and leaded person in NCC Army Wing, and one year experinced person in India Civil Services and have land mark number in General Study in one chance was selected at the place, although he had a great desire of PHD from Department of Physics (Nuclear) Banaras Hindu University as he was specialization in Nuclear in India if he thought for PHD in future. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.200.35.12 (talk) 09:42, 27 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete objectively: zero papers in web of science; one peer-reviewed publication not there yet. "Impact of Indonesian throughflow blockage on the Southern Indian Ocean" Vivek Kumar Pandey*, Vihang Bhatt, A. C. Pandey and I. M. L. Das K. Banerjee Centre of Atmospheric and Ocean Studies,CURRENT SCIENCE, VOL. 93, NO. 3, 10 AUGUST 2007 (a good quality Indian journal) DGG (talk) 11:00, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Recover the page: as notability is not for the science but science is done where and Under whome and was the cercumstances was with him as he was responsible person and others were free and the Institute was now came in full Existance so new People should do his best, In my point of view if no one In India have have done work on the Indonesian region Using POM Model and having such a exact approximate valuess he got, therfore work without proper group and self developed skill shoul be admire and it reason it not clear why one not done best, under experienced guide then one can claim but his work is praise worthy what ever he had done even 30-50 year old India Institute not dare to work on such issue of High resolution where the Ocean Model failed generally and the person have experience on such a model should do comment if he has started work on newly established Centre independently. But the profile by Ekbal is not only emphasisses on science work but the step of Dr. Pandey, where carreer of his own were in safe like Instiute Banaras Hindu University. In last I want to say he is notable person as he remained at vacant place where all students are staying and always doing concerning question on stability of Centre as it was not properly(by Law) establish and was on trial and the in 2005 it was going to closed according the DOD report. It is my comment on deletion policy of Wikipedia from debates, reality can not be deleted one day it come in light of society. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.200.35.12 (talk) 13:43, 27 January 2008 (UTC) The news from KBCAOS says the Dr. Pandey was belonging from the Banaras Hindu University therefore the reccommendation of local teacher was against him who generally participated in interview therfore in second phase of interview for Scientist post and Research Fellow post he reamain satisfied with the Reaserch Fellow Post although at that time he offered SRF post at IIT Delhi at Ocean Forecasting lab but at that time the reccommendation of UGC and CSIR team was not recieved by University of Allahabad, he think to remain at centre KBCAOS till the confirmation letter come and his perfect oath of to make KBCAOS as a national Centre complete at the presence of late Dr. S.B Singh,Ex-Directo, NCMRWF, Noida. Thus he remain at the centre till the viva of his thesis(First Doctoral from KBCAOS), now we can see he was hero of KBCAOS. And therfore he is worthy of natability and paper should be from new student in science and Nature but paper in Physical Oceanography(Computational) on a new area (basic) is not general for a young but possible with Experinced Guide and he will do soon as people think. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.227.207.12 (talk) 16:57, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

The faith of Dr. Pandey can also be shown by his papers also, in all of his papers he given the Institute name KBCAOS only and dos't shown the name of permanent Department of his Guide(Department of Physics, University of Allahabad) where other authors from Centre have both name used KBCAOS and Dept. of Physics as an already established Centres name also indirectly show the effect on mind of reviewer. The person working in same department have 13 of papers in International Journals of Geophysical Fields but Physical Oceanography group don't have such level get as expertise in such field comes afetr some time under much experinced Guide, the paper on international level were don on PC but server in KBCAOS generally forced to closed to make safe as power problem in UP and no permanant source of Disel was available more than 3 hour generator whereas longer run (50-200) years of ocean model needed 10 days on SGI machin available there, then only output data analysis was shortcut and one person have done from out side data as news came but the centre is kind enough from begining of KBCAOS due to internal colaboration but Princeton model case no larg group is involved and in such a high resolution generally outer person not servive. The person have so much paper in international general is connected with knowledgible person also, having long time experince from HRI, Allahabad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.227.207.12 (talk • contribs)

Keep the page on notable list, I want to ask question on paper comment person can he tell how many India Ocean Model and Atmospheric Model till now developed it should asked with Congress Govt. who have ruled till date and how many paper was Prof. Srivastava who was the Co-Ordinator in atmospheric and Ocean Science and Prof. Hari Prakash Saxena(in meteorology), who is working now and HOD of Physics. Please tell me how many papers were with PI and Co PI and co-Investigators papers at time of begining in Meteorology. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.227.207.12 (talk • contribs)


 * Strong Delete: appears to be a vanity article written by a sockpuppet of User:Dr. vivek Kumar Pandey. Note that the article is just about verbatim his user page.  Toddst1 (talk) 16:41, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: Sockpuppet report created: Suspected sock puppets/Dr. vivek Kumar Pandey Toddst1 (talk) 17:00, 29 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.