Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Walzcak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW. – Juliancolton  | Talk 00:13, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Dr. Walzcak

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete another professor where I declined a speedy request. He exists:, but again is lacking in significant coverage in reliable third party soucres. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 15:03, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't even find a homepage for this prof. I found a couple papers (e.g. ) written by a Dr Michael Walzcak about chemistry, but not enough to establish a significant impact in their scholarly discipline. Fails WP:PROF. -Atmoz (talk) 17:12, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'd have to agree with Atmoz, this fails WP:PROF.  Matt (talk) 17:28, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:Prof notability requirements. Full of peacock terms. Wperdue (talk) 21:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC)wperdue
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —David Eppstein (talk) 03:49, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I cleaned up the article (and moved it to a non-misspelled title) but I didn't find any evidence of passing WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:56, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Scopus shows 4 papers, with citations 13, 12, 11, 2. All in very good journals, but all published in connection with his doctoral work. This is not enough for notability though it is certainly enough to warrant discussion rather than speedy. As a rough guide, associate professors at other than the most important research universities are almost always not considered notable here, unless they have an unusually distinguished record. DGG (talk) 17:26, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not seem to pass notability requirements under WP:PROF or WP:BIO.--Eric Yurken (talk) 00:44, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:03, 29 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.