Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Wooday P Krishna


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete (and salt). —Tom Morris (talk) 14:56, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Dr. Wooday P Krishna

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This unsourced biographical article about a not so notable person has been created thrice after deletion. Amartyabag  TALK2ME  05:46, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Judging by the creator's username, this is pretty blatant WP:ARTSPAM. The text is copied from the subject/creator's website (which is a piece of work in itself). Wikipedia is not the place to sing your own praises. ŞůṜīΣĻ ¹98¹ Speak 12:38, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - while it's not a complete copyvio of his website, there's enough direct lifts I would have no problem with this getting speedied under G12. MikeWazowski (talk) 15:10, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - As the article has been deleted before as well, I request the administrators to make the title "Create protected" for atleast a month. Amartyabag   TALK2ME  16:13, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 23 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt. nothing notable here, does not meet WP:BIO or WP:PROF. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 17:56, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.