Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr.muhammad ishaq khan langah


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete by by  under WP:CSD, as a recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion. (non-admin closure) Quasi  human  &#124;  Talk  12:11, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Dr.muhammad ishaq khan langah

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Author refuses to acknowledge sources need to be added, entire page is copied from http://wikibin.org/articles/muhammad-ishaq-khan.html. Also using good-article and semi-protect templates in page despite not being admin or having put article through review. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 05:41, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I have tagged it under speedy deletion of criteria G12 as unambigous copyright infringement.-- Ankit Maity  Talk •  contribs 06:02, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I added the tag of G4 as the same deleted material is in the new article.-- Ankit Maity  Talk •  contribs 06:30, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * G12 removed as the source is a fork of Wikipedia.-- Ankit Maity  Talk •  contribs 07:38, 18 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Under criteria G4.-- Ankit Maity  Talk •  contribs 06:37, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete but only as restoration of deleted content under WP:CSD, not as copyvio. The claimed source was Wikibin, which is a fork of Wikipedia. See Mirrors and forks/Vwxyz. However, much of this article is identical to Muhammad Ishaq Khan which was deleted per Articles for deletion/Muhammad Ishaq Khan earlier this year. No attempt appears to have been made to improve the article compared to how it was when it was deleted before. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:46, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as reconstruction of deleted content. No sources (using Wikibin, a Wikipedia fork, as a source is similar to using Wikipedia itself as a source). J I P  &#124; Talk 08:57, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Hold your horses Does anyone even know if this guy is notable or not? If he is deserving of an article, then just replace the article with a short stub. Theres no reason to delete the article of a encyclopedic topic. If he is not notable, by all means delete.--Coin945 (talk) 10:46, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.