Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr . Ikram Ullah Khan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:41, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Dr . Ikram Ullah Khan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The professor does not appear to easily pass professor test and basic GNG.. Steps were taken to locate sources WP:BEFORE this nomination, but were not successful.. The cited sources does not discuss the subject directly and in detail. This page contains too much original research and is essentially promotion for the subject. GNG says we need "Significant coverage which addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content." Unfortunately based on the cited and available RS, a standalone BLP cannot be created.

For what it's worth, apparently the subject himself created this page (look at the username of the creator). Saqib (talk) 14:46, 20 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - promotional. Deb (talk) 15:06, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete I warned the author with uw-autobiography, which he apparently ignored. I concur with Saqib. There's nothing here to suggest passage of WP:GNG, and certainly not for WP:NPROF. I would be swayed if there were a significant award, but in the list on the article there is nothing significant. 1/4 of it is attendance/participation certificates. This does nothing to support notability. The "Shield" interested me, but I came up with nothing on that as well. Searching Google Scholar came up with two other professors, but not him. Ok, he's a dermatologist. Ok, he's real. But, notable? No. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:08, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 15:13, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 15:13, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 15:13, 20 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete as an obvious promotional vanity article. I see nothing to suggest that WP:NACADEMIC criteria are met. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:47, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt. Blatant promotion of non notable pseudo-scholar. Repeatedly created by various sock puppet accounts under different titles –Ammarpad (talk) 04:09, 21 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.