Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Ashwin Porwal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clear delete after relisting. I will protect this title also.  DGG ( talk ) 22:35, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Dr Ashwin Porwal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Ashwin Porwal Stats )


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Alan Hardest (talk) 07:18, 23 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 July 23.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 07:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable medical doctor. The article is also way too overly promotional.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:09, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

I do not think that this page is way to promotional as he has really put up as what he has done. Has someone even read the references? I doubt. All the references are proving him right and look at his talk page. people are just saying that the vote is for keeping it on Wikipedia page as he is really deserved to. Valentina11112 (talk) 06:07, 25 July 2016 (UTC) — Valentina 11112 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

↑Kindly consider the discussion going on talk page of Dr Ashwin Porwal as well, i do not think that this article should be taken of as it is a biography of India's First proctology Doctor and who has done so much of good in social cause .And he has even arrived on various news channels. if the page was to be promotional then why wouldn't he add various other information like about he is the first Dr to do POP surgery in india. Treated more than 30000 piles patients, and various other information. you can read the references given in the article and those references can prove my words. But this all matter isn't given in article and this shows that it isn't a promotional activity @ talk:Johnpacklambert from Franklin10hhc (talk) 06:31, 25 July 2016 (UTC) — Franklin10hhc (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

The references given are enough to prove his worthiness and to be a part of Wikipedia content, I didn't find any promotional content in this page. I give a thumbs up to this article and it should be a part on wikiWiki111222333 (talk) 06:41, 26 July 2016 (UTC) — Wiki111222333 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete Non-notable. A CV and PR (which if you read the citations is obvious) does not constitute a reason for inclusion. Engleham (talk) 12:07, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alan Hardest (talk) 16:34, 30 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:39, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:53, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:53, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:53, 31 July 2016 (UTC)


 * WP:TNT Delete per WP:NPOV. I have seen many AfDs about South Asian doctors, who tend to have "wow-check-out-how-good-this-guy-is-and-how-much-he-has-achieved" wikipages, but this one is really over the top. Note that Ashwin Porwal has been speedy deleted several times, up to the point that it has been salted. - HyperGaruda (talk) 05:23, 31 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.