Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Asif Shahid


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe deckertalk 21:06, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Dr Asif Shahid

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable individual lacking non-trivial support. red dogsix (talk) 00:46, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and Salt given the 3 deletions now and it's clear in the sheer blatancy of it existing again within 4 months again; if this should ever come in mainspace again, it will be at AfC, not by a starting user themselves. WP:NOT applies because it's clear this is not going to be anything else but advertising. SwisterTwister   talk  02:13, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

--Muhammad Farooq (talk) 22:44, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * This article Dr Asif Shahid should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (Dr Asif Shahid is a notable journalist from Pakistan)
 * I've taken the liberty of removing the link to "revolvy.com" in your list above. That site is a mirror of wikipedia; he is included in that folder based on his inclusion in the category here. This undermines your position that he is independently notable, so I presume you don't mind the removal. Kuru   (talk)  16:18, 12 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable medical doctor and journalist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:15, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 16:21, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 16:21, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 16:21, 12 December 2016 (UTC)


 * delete bunch of SPS, other non-independent sources, and passing mentions. Obviously promotional.Jytdog (talk) 17:38, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * delete and salt almost every ref is fake. one of them downloaded malware onto my computer. Jytdog (talk) 03:57, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
 * delete The lack of independent coverage means that he does not appear notable when judged against WP:BASIC or WP:JOURNALIST. Drchriswilliams (talk) 18:12, 18 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.