Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Joseph Aldred


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted (G12) by Rhaworth. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 15:07, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Dr Joseph Aldred

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

All the sources are either by the subject or by closely affiliated sources. No significant coverage in independent, reliable sources at all. Vexations (talk) 12:48, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 13:31, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 13:31, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * added new search bar, name in lede is Joe Aldred.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:54, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note that the article has been previously created and deleted as Joesph Aldred (A3 and A12), Bishop Dr Joe Aldred(A10) and Joseph aldred(A7). I don't think anyone ever tried to create Joe Aldred. Vexations (talk) 17:19, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * yes, I saw it when I looked at the page creator's history. But there is coverage like this .   Enough comes up on those search bars to merit a close look, perhaps even the effort to create a decent page.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:31, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * it is a fact that the black church is very inadequately covered on Wikipedia.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:32, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:35, 15 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete bishops in the Pentecostal tradition are not assumed notable. All sourcing appears to be run of the mill and what’d you’d expect from someone who hosts a minor religious radio show. Not notable as a cleric or a broadcaster. Regardless, notability doesn’t even matter as this is borderline G11, and as such fails NOTSPAM. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:40, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I have nominated for G12 speedy deletion, as the material is copyvio from http://www.drjoealdred.info/. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 02:10, 16 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.