Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Nancy Mroczek


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Speedily deleted by Jj137 per WP:CSD after author requested deletion. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Dr Nancy Mroczek

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Procedural nom; I've just declined a speedy request on this one, on the basis of the publications and TV appearances, but any notability seems so minor that she's right on the WP:PROF borderline; bringing her over here to get a consensus. —  iride  scent  02:47, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete only gets 175 ghits, no google news archive hits and no google scholar hits. Only real claim is that she appears on a local Boston cable show, looks like a vanity article to me. RMHED (talk) 02:54, 4 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- Pete.Hurd (talk) 04:45, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * delete she doesn't come anywhere near passing WP:PROF, so I think notability relies on her passing WP:MUSIC, or whether things like &  (FWIW I'm a big 'X' fan so I tried downloading the mp3s, didn't work) amount to "extensive coverage in reliable secondary sources", I think neither of those fly. So, non-notable, but I'd go to the bar if they were playing. Pete.Hurd (talk) 08:11, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Obvious vanity article, no real claims to notability. --Crusio (talk) 10:05, 4 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep :Dr Nancy Mrocaek is a welknown radio personality and a subject matter expert in futures trading. In psychology she has number of articles published already. She is an environmentalist and also animal rights activist. An allround personality like Dr. Nancy is worth mentioning on wiki -- nanpro
 * — nanpro (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * comment ISI WoS has three cited articles for "Mroczek, NS" they are: "THESIS U MINNESOTA" and "DISS ABSTR INT B" cited once each, and a journal article "LAB ANIM (1992) 21:27" cited a mere three times. Google scholar turns up more publications, but none of the others by her show any citations (although I stopped looking after the first five pages of results).  I just don't think that kind of scientific output passes WP:PROF. Pete.Hurd (talk) 19:01, 4 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per above.--Kannie | talk 22:16, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete A Highbeam.com search brought up a few local articles on this woman, if anything they convinced me further this woman does not meet notability requirements.OneHappyHusky (talk) 07:18, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: unnotable --Drhlajos (talk) 18:09, 5 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.