Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Radheshyam Bhagwandas Somani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus herein is for deletion. North America1000 23:48, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Dr Radheshyam Bhagwandas Somani

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to be an autobiography. No indication of notability, no reliable sources provided. Two previous PRODs were removed without explanation by page creator. mikeman67 (talk) 20:15, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - The page appears to be self-promotion. Two references are the subject's own LinkedIn page and a similar self-written bio.  The third and last reference is a speech given by the subject.  Nothing shows notability.--Rpclod (talk) 20:43, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:56, 6 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete unless improvement is made. My searches found nothing outstandingly significant (even nothing at Scholar) and maybe it's the language and country barrier but there's nothing to suggest good coverage (I'm not familiar with those awards enough to say). SwisterTwister   talk  18:03, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I was able to find a few papers which were cowriten by "Amit Radheshyam Somani", who may or may not be the same person, I couldn't tell. However they did not show notability. When one of the main sources for an article is a linked-in entry, the person is unlikely to be notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 07:00, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sources are inadequate to document a pass of WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:42, 9 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.